112 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
Why do so many people deny the fact that feminists will ban sex robots and VR waifus? There is no way in hell Women will give up sexual power. Porn just got illegal in Iceland, Canada has already banned sex dolls, prostitution is being suppressed.
And this silicon valley video will shock you. A feminist wants to ban sex robots cause they can't consent, and that means that men rape them.
>I remember a few years ago on the internet when sexbots were first being discussed as a serious future. Everyone was saying "Women will be up in arms about it, and feminists will try to maintain their sexual power position by crying rape." Honestly, I didn't believe it. I thought that it was a funny hypothetical to shit on 3rd wave radfems. Thank you, Jincey Lumpkin, for destroying all of my feelings of irony towards modern feminism. Now I know that when someone on the internet is talking about "post-active rape" or some shit, instead of laughing I should start preparing to hear about how it's a serious issue within the next few months.
0 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
>I have done academic courses on cognitive neuroscience at the university of Utrecht (Netherlands). It all depends on the training a person has had. Fighter pilots have been recorded spotting 1/255th of a frame. That's right: 255 frames per second And they could give a rough estimate as to what they've seen.
>Edit: seanalltogether took the time to post a source (220 fps and they could identify the aircraft). Edit2: Seeing that my post is the 2nd hit on google when looking for 'max frames per second eye can see', little add-on: This research went looking for the temporal gaps that people could perceive, I'm linking to the result diagram.. The figure about vision is a box-plot. The average population would perceive about 45 frames per second (nice going HFR movies). But on the other hand, you have 25% of the population who will percieve more than 60 frames per second, with extremes going to seeing temporal gaps of up to 2 ms. Which is insane. When I wrote my replies and the first post, I did not know about this research. New conclusion: By far most of the human population (test in USA) will see more than 24 fps, only the extremes will see just the 24 fps or less (we're going towards visualle impaired elderly). More than 50% of the population will benefit greatly from FPS of 45+. Trained fighter pilots can see even more, so training of the brain might just be possible in perceiving a lower threshold of temporal gap.
fucking BTFO, stupid underage murrfag normtards. if you can't appreciate high frame rates it just means you're retarded and it doesn't apply to humans in general.