[  3  /  a  /  adv  /  an  /  c  /  cgl  /  ck  /  cm  /  co  /  diy  /  fa  /  fit  /  g  /  i  /  ic  /  jp  /  k  /  lit  /  m  /  mlp  /  mu  /  n  /  o  /  p  /  po  /  q  /  sci  /  sp  /  tg  /  toy  /  trv  /  tv  /  v  /  vg  /  vp  /  w  /  wg  /  wsg  /  x  ]

/k/ Weapons

Warning: All the content of this page originally come from 4chan.org. This is only a partial archive made to avoid destruction. Some posts and images may be missing. All the messages below have been posted by anonymous users and we do not guarantee any truth of what they said.
For any illegal content, please contact me so that I can immediatly destroy it!

Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:24:11 No.33322593

[Missing image file: ]

Would the Ruger Alaskan loaded with 44 specials be a good choice for home defense?


>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:25:52 No.33322608
Short answer, no

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:27:13 No.33322619
>>33322593
sure i guess. be prepared for blast lololol

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:27:42 No.33322623
>>33322619
What?

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:29:25 No.33322644
>>33322619
44 specials would be low recoil in this particular gun.

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:33:21 No.33322668
>>33322644
>>33322619
>>33322623
he's talking about muzzle flash and literal blast from the report of firing.

125gr .357 magnum has almost a hundred years of 1 hit stops out of 3-4" revolvers. most .44 special loads are anemic despite what it's capable of. buffalo bore 240gr pills loaded on top of the sort of powder to get to 950fps is what you would want in a performing .44 special, but all that is largely a waste as the .357 is both cheaper, more versatile, and already has plenty of history as a defensive handgun round.

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:35:54 No.33322697
>>33322668
4" is really the minimum for .357

>>33322593
>Is a low capacity, high recoil revolver a good choice for home defence?

What do you think? It's better than a not-a-gun(tm) though

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:37:37 No.33322709
>>33322697
>high recoil
see >>33322644

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:39:17 No.33322721
carrying is mostly about whatever is comfy mayn

my dream is to carry a modern version of a lemat

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:41:28 No.33322737
>>33322721
fuck im retarded i thought this thread was about carrying

for home defense shotguns, preferably pump, and modern sporting rifles are the only right answers, but if you want to use revolvers then you should get like 5 of them and place them next to you.. preferably with 8 shot cylinders

and i just realized carrying a 44 special is stupid because you can get an 8 shot 357 for the same cylinder size

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:49:42 No.33322800
>>33322709
.44 special is still high enough recoil to make it less than practical.

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 05:54:18 No.33322828
>>33322737
Ol1911?

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 06:28:42 No.33323103
>>33322828
yeah xD i like the grip he has on the "pug" 327

if i were him i would put that grip on the tr8 and call it a day!

heres a link to the video just in case:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_fGAq_TuyU

nutnfancy, as spergy as he is, has a cool video titled revolver porn that came out recently that has some cool information and configurations for revolvers.. i think his son tactical doodle put boot grips on a his TR8 actually which is a cool idea for carry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkSLdvX3t68

>>
Admiral Autism 2017-03-16 06:31:27 No.33323122
>>33322593
Just buy an ak "Pistol"

>>
Anonymous 2017-03-16 06:40:19 No.33323202
>>33323122
I'm in California.







[  3  /  a  /  adv  /  an  /  c  /  cgl  /  ck  /  cm  /  co  /  diy  /  fa  /  fit  /  g  /  i  /  ic  /  jp  /  k  /  lit  /  m  /  mlp  /  mu  /  n  /  o  /  p  /  po  /  q  /  sci  /  sp  /  tg  /  toy  /  trv  /  tv  /  v  /  vg  /  vp  /  w  /  wg  /  wsg  /  x  ]

Contact me | All the content on this website come from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

Dofus quêtes

Page loaded in 0.000772 seconds.