[  3  /  a  /  adv  /  an  /  c  /  cgl  /  ck  /  cm  /  co  /  diy  /  fa  /  fit  /  g  /  i  /  ic  /  jp  /  k  /  lit  /  m  /  mlp  /  mu  /  n  /  o  /  p  /  po  /  q  /  sci  /  sp  /  tg  /  toy  /  trv  /  tv  /  v  /  vg  /  vp  /  w  /  wg  /  wsg  /  x  ]

/lit/ Literature

Threads added between 2015/04/08 and 2015/04/15

Threads by date

From 2015/04/08 22:00 to 2015/04/09 04:00 (1)
From 2015/04/09 04:00 to 2015/04/09 10:00 (0)
From 2015/04/09 10:00 to 2015/04/09 16:00 (0)
From 2015/04/09 16:00 to 2015/04/09 22:00 (0)
From 2015/04/09 22:00 to 2015/04/10 04:00 (0)
From 2015/04/10 04:00 to 2015/04/10 10:00 (0)
From 2015/04/10 10:00 to 2015/04/10 16:00 (0)
From 2015/04/10 16:00 to 2015/04/10 22:00 (2)
From 2015/04/10 22:00 to 2015/04/11 04:00 (2)
From 2015/04/11 04:00 to 2015/04/11 10:00 (0)
From 2015/04/11 10:00 to 2015/04/11 16:00 (1)
From 2015/04/11 16:00 to 2015/04/11 22:00 (4)
From 2015/04/11 22:00 to 2015/04/12 04:00 (7)
From 2015/04/12 04:00 to 2015/04/12 10:00 (2)
From 2015/04/12 10:00 to 2015/04/12 16:00 (2)
From 2015/04/12 16:00 to 2015/04/12 22:00 (3)
From 2015/04/12 22:00 to 2015/04/13 04:00 (6)
From 2015/04/13 04:00 to 2015/04/13 10:00 (5)
From 2015/04/13 10:00 to 2015/04/13 16:00 (0)
From 2015/04/13 16:00 to 2015/04/13 22:00 (2)
From 2015/04/13 22:00 to 2015/04/14 04:00 (7)
From 2015/04/14 04:00 to 2015/04/14 10:00 (11)
From 2015/04/14 10:00 to 2015/04/14 16:00 (0)
From 2015/04/14 16:00 to 2015/04/14 22:00 (0)
From 2015/04/14 22:00 to 2015/04/15 04:00 (0)
From 2015/04/15 04:00 to 2015/04/15 10:00 (1)
From 2015/04/15 10:00 to 2015/04/15 16:00 (1)
From 2015/04/15 16:00 to 2015/04/15 22:00 (1)
From 2015/04/15 22:00 to 2015/04/16 04:00 (3)

Most viewed threads in this category

Project: /lit/'s Philosophy Guide 2nd official thread

80 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
Last thread: https://warosu.org/lit/thread/S6384218#p6384218 WARNING: READ OP AGAIN IT CHANGED! OFFICIAL /lit/ Philosophy GUIDE! The guide to end all guides on Western Philosophy! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE OPEN THE DOC AND READ THE PREFACE AND INTRODUCTION, IT WILL ANSWER MANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/edit?usp=sharing >I don't want to read your preface and introduction because I'm a fag, I demand you to tell me what's this projects aim quickly! Look at the OP image, the guy on the right is me and the guy on the left is you reading the philosophical books given by this guide. This means this guide is just a guide on what to read. Hello /lit/ it's me again with the /lit/ guide to Western Philosophy. Changelog: Between this thread and the last thread alot more grammar and format editing has been done, a big one being the complaint of color coding used. Also despite proclaiming German Idealism was finished but further admendments were made! >Changes in German Idealism section Further sentencing errors and missing ISBNs were corrected Minor update to Schelling Book 014043335X was added as an cheaper alternative to the T.M knox editions in "FURTHER READING ON HEGEL" Information on Goethe and Holderin were added to "FURTHER READINGS ON GERMAN IDEALISM". In the last thread I also asked for improvements to the guide and I got one! The excellent post by anon the Medieval guy can be viewed here The core programme of only ST Aquinas and ST Augustine in the Medieval Philosophy has not been changed, but now it has been expanded upon due thanks to the "divine illumination" of anon the Medieval guy. This changed the one sentence mentioning of other important thinkers >There’s also Duns Scotus, Ockham and Pierre Abélard and so on for more theological thought to what's new in the Medieval section of the guide. Check it out! >But but but you said there won't be any major changes since everything is basically finished up to German Idealism! This is not a major edit at all as the core structure of Medieval Philosophy is preserved (Aquinas and Augustine). What's changed is merely a bit more of explication on the era and an expansion on who to read for more Medieval Theological thought. Admittedly I was lazy here in not adding much to Medieval Philosophy as If I remember correctly I wrote Descartes first before Medieval Philosophy and wanted to preserve formatting (that is, keep Descartes's stuff on one page) by saving space. But have no worries this is now rectified! Montaigne was added Entirely new: Skeleton of the Schopenhauer, Nietzsche & Kierkegaard sections added. Theres not much right now and I'm rather busy lately with personal stuff so I would like some help.
8 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
What is the best literature on city decadence and urban ennui?

non-Russian Slavic literature thread

25 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
Everybody knows and loves/hates Russian lit. We have to remember that there's a shitload of minor literatures all around it, theoretically stemming from the same root - Slavic. I'm talking about Ukrainians, Belarussians, Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Slovenians, Croats, Serbs, Bosnians, Bulgarians and Macedonians. They surely must've written at least something interesting, haven't they?
73 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
If you could purge one ideology (and all of its followers) from existence which would it be and why?
138 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
Who is the worst philosopher ever?
12 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
Should I read this? /lit/
55 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
What movie based on a book is better than the book?
112 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
Which denomination of Christianity has the best aesthetics? pic related, I vote for Orthodox
8 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
what books are Reaper pill? >A loner, though not anti-social. >Sees death and killing as something spiritual. >Carries himself as if living on another plane of existence, and can be very eloquent and poetic about how he perceives things. >He's almost spooky, has an unsettling calmness.
84 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
>Stirner isn't close to liberalism It seems /lit/ is acidic to the based view that Stirner is right wing. However, Stirner translated one of the first and certainly the most important German translation of Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith, as well, he clearly argues that competition is true freedom in Der Einzige. Why can't you yet accept that Stirner is closer to pure right wing thought than left wing? Also Stirner thread
181 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
Library adventures >homeless people go completely silent when I go past because they're not selling drugs >looking for Borges >some homeless guy asks me what im looking for, tell him "books" he says "yeah books" >music playing loudly >someone is clicking a mouse 2 times per second >singing along with YouTube videos >some guy is unconscious in the basement >the ambulance showed up I've only been in the library for an hour
34 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
Does no political ideology offer true freedom?
66 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
What are some good books that have themes revolving around mental illness?
33 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
So everyone hates scientism. But what else do you have besides the scientific method to get to real knowledge?
58 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
>"Hitler and the Nazis misused Nietzsche's philosophy!" If I ever hear this I instantly know that the person is an absolute moron and probably has a sub-130 IQ.


142 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
What were David Foster Wallace's political views?

8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man

16 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
Well shit he was right all along. >It is useless to argue about polygamy, it must be taken as a fact existing everywhere, the mere regulation of which is the problem to be solved. Where are there, then, any real monogamists? We all live, at any rate for a time, and the majority of us always, in polygamy. Consequently, as each man needs many women, nothing is more just than to let him, nay, make it incumbent upon him to provide for many women. By this means woman will be brought back to her proper and natural place as a subordinate being, and the lady, that monster of European civilisation and Christian–Teutonic stupidity, with her ridiculous claim to respect and veneration, will no longer exist; there will still be women, but no unhappy women, of whom Europe is at present full. The Mormons’ standpoint is right. http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/17-to-1-reproductive-success >Once upon a time, 4,000 to 8,000 years after humanity invented agriculture, something very strange happened to human reproduction. Across the globe, for every 17 women who were reproducing, passing on genes that are still around today—only one man did the same.
67 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
1 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
I don't know. Think about this though, if you watch an action movie and hundreds of people die in it, it doesn't really phase you one bit. You can have the idea of death in your head without trying to actually understand it. It's good to think about death. It's the ultimate motivator. I like to think our brain has some sort of ability to distract us from the thought of inevitable death. And that depression is an illness of the brain where certain sensory functions don't work so well Yeah, that's basically the root of religion. They're a means to avoid death or thinking about death. I feel like religion beautifies death Like in Christianity like saying theres a heaven Do you know how fucking awesome it would be to believe in heaven??? It would be fucking great. The only real thing I like about not being so religious anymore is that I worry less about sinning and the wrath of god But this whole "possible karma" thing still worries me a bit too...keeps me in cheque I dont like going on about myself but I dont think im in the best frame of mind atm Yeah, I've been a bit too obsessed with trying to interpret the world in the clearest way possible, even if it's terrifying. Realistically everything could be meaningless But while youre here a good human should contribute to society Its all about benefiting. Having children could be seen as contributing to the continuation of the human race. However if you are not able to care for those children properly then you are contributing negatively to society. Having children can be seen as a selfish thing, especially if you are not equipped financially or mentally to care for them and raise them. Thank god for doctors and people who give a damn about others. This enables the continuation and development of society. Im not an arts major though, Im just speaking from my own point of view.
6 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: ]
is there a "proper" way to read this meme loving fuck?

[  3  /  a  /  adv  /  an  /  c  /  cgl  /  ck  /  cm  /  co  /  diy  /  fa  /  fit  /  g  /  i  /  ic  /  jp  /  k  /  lit  /  m  /  mlp  /  mu  /  n  /  o  /  p  /  po  /  q  /  sci  /  sp  /  tg  /  toy  /  trv  /  tv  /  v  /  vg  /  vp  /  w  /  wg  /  wsg  /  x  ]

Contact me | All the content on this website come from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

Dofus quêtes

Page loaded in 0.021472 seconds.