57 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: Brothers-Karamazov,-The---Fyodor-Do(...).jpg]
Is there a term for a weeaboo-like person, who, instead of loving Japanese culture, loves Russian culture? There ought to be.
I'm talking about the motherfuckers who read Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, who play Metro 2033 and Red Orchestra, and watch Stalker and Come and See. Hell, they may even own a Mosin-Nagant
There's gotta be enough of them out there for a label to exist
Is this acceptable or unacceptable?
2 more posts in this thread. [Missing image file: girlinlibrary.jpg]
Okay. Short story collections. Sometimes, collections from the same author re-use material. Maybe there's a collection with 70% new material, and 30% old material from a previous collection. Often, a collection is entirely new, except for stuff from magazines or whatever.
My question is this: is re-using material okay with you, to any extent? I personally think that there should never be repeaties. I mean, Asimov did quite a lot of reprints, and Borges is fucking terrible for it: maybe 50% of Ficciones and Labyrinths crossover.
Thoughts on this? I can't recall ever seeing a discussion about this on /lit/.