[  3  /  a  /  adv  /  an  /  c  /  cgl  /  ck  /  cm  /  co  /  diy  /  fa  /  fit  /  g  /  i  /  ic  /  jp  /  k  /  lit  /  m  /  mlp  /  mu  /  n  /  o  /  p  /  po  /  q  /  sci  /  sp  /  tg  /  toy  /  trv  /  tv  /  v  /  vg  /  vp  /  w  /  wg  /  wsg  /  x  ]

/p/ Photography

Warning: All the content of this page originally come from 4chan.org. This is only a partial archive made to avoid destruction. Some posts and images may be missing. All the messages below have been posted by anonymous users and we do not guarantee any truth of what they said.
For any illegal content, please contact me so that I can immediatly destroy it!

Anonymous 2013-01-02 10:12:48 No.1826462

[Missing image file: SidebySideFr.jpg]

What are the best options for a new/used camera under $400?
Right now one of the cameras I'm being offered is a lightly used (under 500 images) EOS 1100D for $300.

Will be used for nature photography when I'm backbacking in September.
Also, any guides you personally would recommend to an amateur?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2011-02-04T11:58:25-08:00FlashNo Flash, Compulsory, Red-Eye ReduceImage Width1280Image Height585


>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 10:36:12 No.1826479
>>1826462
For cheap? 35mm film camera with the equipment(very cheap) to develop your own film.
At the 400$ range you either have some point and shoots or some old DSLRs that havent aged well and you have to bump the iso by a lot for night photography

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 10:40:18 No.1826483
There's a lot of options in that price range. You could easily get a 550D body for that price, or probably a 40D body as well. If you save another $150, you can get a 5D classic

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 10:46:02 No.1826486
>>1826483

Is the 40D a lot better?

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 12:50:59 No.1826536
>>1826486
Not at all since digital ages so poorly

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 13:05:22 No.1826554
>>1826536
Only in the eyes of gearfags.

An ancient 40D or 5D will still take a technically excellent photograph if you do your bit.

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 13:33:06 No.1826561
>>1826462
If it's of interest you can get a K-01 for 300-400 depending on lenses (that 40mm is sweeeet) and sellers. Although probably not as ergonomic as a dslr it's still better built than any of the mentioned save the xxD probably, and will kill all of them in IQ.

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 13:42:55 No.1826563
>>1826486
unless you need video, yes

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 13:54:22 No.1826570
>>1826554
Yeah you have fun pushing 6400+ISO on that 40D/5D

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 14:00:04 No.1826577
>>1826570
>he thinks rabals are usable over 3200

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 14:11:23 No.1826585
>>1826577
They have firmware/hardware updates so yeah a rabal would be much more suitable or a film camera since its very cheap and cool.

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 14:38:35 No.1826613
>>1826570
>thinks that a clean 6400 is a must-have feature
>thinks that rabals can into 6400
>6400
>rabal

Good luck, faggit, hope you get through that horrendous babby phase of herp-de-derp I REQUIRE MOAR ISO!

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 15:45:24 No.1826654
>>1826570
>Yeah you have fun pushing 6400+ISO on that 40D/5D
The max you can go an the 5D and 40D is ISO 1600.

After navigating some super secret menus and pressing some cheat codes you can enable H mode - which is basically ISO 1600 boosted by a stone age DIGIC to ISO 3200.

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 16:04:51 No.1826665
>>1826654
Yes, hence why he used the term 'pushing'.

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 16:10:05 No.1826671
>>1826665
But Rebals can boost to ISO 6400 and 12800 in-camera. 40D/5D cannot go higher than 3200

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 16:13:56 No.1826676
>>1826671
who cares? it looks like turd on high iso

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 16:24:34 No.1826682
>>1826671
Given how ugly ISO 6400+ is on crop canons, that's hardly an important feature. For rare emergency use, underexposing+pushing on 40D/5D is not a problem.

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 16:34:30 No.1826689
>>1826671
Who cares when it looks like shit?

It's like these cheap compacts that go to 3200....Why??

Just because one camera will go to 12800 and another only 3200, it doesn't mean one will automatically be better than the other at say 1600 or whatever. Is this all new to you?

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 17:05:55 No.1826710
>>1826689
...but you can, bro.

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 17:08:30 No.1826714
>>1826710
You can shoot video with a D90 but you wouldn't fucking want to.

>>
Anonymous 2013-01-02 18:56:37 No.1826809
>>1826714
...but you can, bro.







[  3  /  a  /  adv  /  an  /  c  /  cgl  /  ck  /  cm  /  co  /  diy  /  fa  /  fit  /  g  /  i  /  ic  /  jp  /  k  /  lit  /  m  /  mlp  /  mu  /  n  /  o  /  p  /  po  /  q  /  sci  /  sp  /  tg  /  toy  /  trv  /  tv  /  v  /  vg  /  vp  /  w  /  wg  /  wsg  /  x  ]

Contact me | All the content on this website come from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

Dofus quêtes

Page loaded in 0.022269 seconds.