[  3  /  a  /  adv  /  an  /  c  /  cgl  /  ck  /  cm  /  co  /  diy  /  fa  /  fit  /  g  /  i  /  ic  /  jp  /  k  /  lit  /  m  /  mlp  /  mu  /  n  /  o  /  p  /  po  /  q  /  sci  /  sp  /  tg  /  toy  /  trv  /  tv  /  v  /  vg  /  vp  /  w  /  wg  /  wsg  /  x  ]

/q/ 4chan Discussion

Warning: All the content of this page originally come from 4chan.org. This is only a partial archive made to avoid destruction. Some posts and images may be missing. All the messages below have been posted by anonymous users and we do not guarantee any truth of what they said.
For any illegal content, please contact me so that I can immediatly destroy it!

Anonymous 2013-03-07 10:41:23 No.462751

[Missing image file: oy vey.jpg]

In a few hours this bitch will release her first video

and /v/ will witness the biggest shitstorm of all time

so please help us

we need a mod who constantly browses /v/ and deletes ever single one of these threads

thanks


>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 10:51:06 No.462755
No, we need a stickied thread with no post limit

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 10:55:17 No.462760
If /v/ wants to shit itself, let it.

It's not the moderator's responsibility to stop you idiots from fucking yourselves over.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 10:56:52 No.462761
>>462751

she and other such faux feminists are part of /v/ culture now

>>462755

may help like keeping the flies away from the food with placing shit in a corner

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 10:57:43 No.462762
It's video games. We have a right to discuss it.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 10:59:11 No.462763

[Missing image file: shitquake.jpg]
Yeah, if you could make "Anita" a 24 hour bannable offense, that would help too.

But really, get your dudes ready for the shitwaves.

>>462755
I feel like doing this will just create a giant misogynistic sticky. It's like making about a sticky about The Walking Dead in /ck/ or something. We'll have a sticky that isn't even about videogames on the supposed "videogame board." It would likely contain it, but fuck if it doesn't irk me that it's the solution.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:00:42 No.462767
>>462763
It wouldn't solve anything, you always get retards who think their opinion is vitally important, so they make their own threads to get more attention.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:01:12 No.462768
>>462763
Rereading my post, I feel like I'm giving off the wrong vibe.

I'm all for aimless misogyny and it becoming the theme of rage threads, which also pretty much aren't videogames. I love that shit.

I just hate giving this bitch attention. I hated watching /v/ give her more than enough examples to draw from during the Kickstarter campaign, and I'm not looking forward to part 2.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:01:20 No.462769
>>462762
You know damn well no discussions pertaining to video games will take place in Anita Sarkeesian / tumblr feminazi threads.

They have no place on /v/.

Any reference to her and her videos should be ban on sight for the next month.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:01:29 No.462770
>>462763
Discussing the video isn't automatically misogynistic, even if 99% of the posts are

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:01:54 No.462772
>>462762
>It's video games.
no it's not
no one will talk about the games or her videos just retarded "check your privilege" posts, spamming, starting raids and other butthurt shit and that 24/7

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:02:00 No.462773
>>462763
>make "Anita" a 24 hour bannable offense
Fund it.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:03:01 No.462774
you ppl are just as bad for shitposting about shitposters, hide the thread and go about your life just like every other shitpost any other day in this shithole

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:03:15 No.462775
>>462755
This. It's a woman trying to destroy the future of video games, so I guess it's video game related. Containing the outrage in one stickied thread would probably be for the best, though.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:04:47 No.462776
>>462774
>you ppl are just as bad for shitposting about shitposters

THIS

the hypocrisy is blatantly pathetic

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:05:26 No.462777
>we need a stickied thread with no post limit
yes, giving her more attention will clearly help
you're a faggot
just ban every one making threads about her or posting in these threads

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:05:48 No.462778
>>462772
>no one will talk about the games or her videos just retarded "check your privilege" posts, spamming, starting raids and other butthurt shit and that 24/7
so business as usual, eh?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:05:49 No.462779
I would like to some mods to watch out for other boards as well like /co/. I know this shit will start to show up there due to people who lurk both boards.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:06:45 No.462780
>>462775
But it won't be about videogames. /v/ will just turn into a giant misogynistic tornado, just like the last time this bitch got tons of money for no reason.

It's impossible for /v/ to reasonably discuss this issue without it being that way. I'd rather just have that shit purged immediately, so we don't have to deal with the idiots starting shit, and the wave of feminazi/pseudo-feminazi SA goons/tumblrqueens fucking up the place.

I just want to have a normal day where I discuss some Earthbound, shit on indie devs, post in battlestation thread, shit on Other M, talk about whatever the FOTM sinking ship is, and call it a night. I don't want to have to sift through the mountain of Anita-related threads all day/night.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:07:14 No.462781
>>462751
>filename
Also no video games allowed on /v/. Apparently Anita threads now are more unacceptable than they were for months. Why not just sticky a thread so the board isn't flooded, and everyone gets to vent about the Jew Overlord. Everybody's happy.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:08:21 No.462783

[Missing image file: Sit perfectly still.gif]
While you're at it, give /v/ IDs

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:08:59 No.462784
I'm personally tempted to completely wordfilter "feminism" and "check your privilege" but I'm afraid the whole board will disappear in a puff of ironic shitposting smoke.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:09:27 No.462785
>>462781
>Why not just sticky a thread so the board isn't flooded
that wont work and you know it
>>462783
this

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:09:28 No.462786
The more /v/ rages about this shit the more attention it'll get, and the more ammo they'll give to the people who claim that everyone who dislikes Sarkeesian's shit is just a violently misogynist basement dweller.

It's partially /v/'s fault Women vs Tropes got this big to begin with, don't let them blow it up any further.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:09:48 No.462787
>>462751
>we need a mod who constantly browses /v/ and deletes ever single one of these threads
No, fuck that. Let it play itself out now. Trying to suppress it will just make it last longer and guarantee more reposts.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:10:16 No.462789
People who are against the Anita threads (on the grounds of not giving her attention) are plotting to "destroy" the threads by spamming child pornography, they've even uploaded a "cp pack" to Mega.co.nz for people to dl and join in with.

So you might have a bit of a problem on your hands.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:10:18 No.462790

[Missing image file: Faggot.png]
>>462780
>Desperately needing /v/ this much

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:12:12 No.462793
how are you fuckheads posting about "how dumb posting about anita" any different to the people posting about "how dumb anita" is? you don't see that link? no?

hide the threads and grop up, realise your opinions dont matter when they bring nothing to the table

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:12:36 No.462794
>>462761
>faux feminists

But she does represent feminism as a whole

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:13:03 No.462795

[Missing image file: 1342502789958.jpg]
You can't stop it.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:13:11 No.462796
>>462780

Go to /vg/.

Actually, that's a good idea, can someone help keep /vg/ clean and let things run their course on /v/?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:13:25 No.462797
>>462794
No, she really doesn't.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:13:29 No.462798
Just filter the threads, it's not that hard.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:13:41 No.462799
>>462793
Shut the fuck up. This will be a massive shit fucking storm and the mods on our shithole of a board need to wake the fuck up and do their job because THIS. THIS RIGHT HERE needs to be stopped. Auto ban the word feminist, Anita, Sarkeesian

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:13:59 No.462800
>>462797
Yes she does, unless you are one of those idiots who think feminism is or was ever about equality.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:14:01 No.462801
>>462794
So does any member of any cause with a sufficiently large soapbox.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:15:12 No.462802
>>462800
Susan B Anthony.
/argument

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:15:17 No.462803
>>462800
Not all feminists think she does, so she doesn't, anymore than anyone here represents the whole of /v/.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:15:21 No.462804
Something should be done. Constant deletions will just piss people off, and they'll make more threads to "fight the power".

A sticky might be best.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:16:09 No.462806
Let it spill over the schools and churches, let the bodies pile up in the streets. In the end they'll beg us to save them.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:16:13 No.462807
>>462798
>just filter pony threads, it's not that hard
>just filter porn dumps, it's not that hard
>just filter ad spam, it's not that hard

Just because you can filter it doesn't make it ok.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:17:11 No.462809
>>462796
I actually support this. Let /v/ do what it wants. /v/ has never been about video games anyway. It shouldn't really seep over into /vg/, but most of the crybabies in this thread don't know how to use the "hide thread" option.
>>462799
Looks like someone struck a nerve

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:17:55 No.462810
Back the fuck off?!!?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:18:30 No.462811
>>462809
They fucking did.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:18:51 No.462812

[Missing image file: v was never good.jpg]
>>462809
>/v/ has never been about video games anyway

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:19:23 No.462813
Word filter Anita and Sarkeesian.

It's a weird enough name to not be used as much.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:19:28 No.462814
>>462803
Really it's not far off from saying that Quentin represents all of /v/.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:20:33 No.462816
>>462813
Also feminism. cis scum and etc,

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:20:48 No.462817
>>462803
Clearly she must represent a very large number of feminists given the amount of people that gave her money, the fact that she has been called on multiple times to give talks about feminism by other feminists, etc.

Whether it's "most" or "a lot" seems like a moot point.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:20:55 No.462818
>>462814
Well he surely represents all of neo-/v/, what with how much they suck his cock.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:21:08 No.462819
>>462813
Because that worked for "Leddit", right?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:21:35 No.462820
There is nothing that can be done about it.

1) Filtering the video URL or her name will just result in people evading the wordfilter and screeching "BUTTHURT FEMINAZI MODS!"

2) Deleting threads is pointless as about a dozen more will be made every minute.

3) A sticky is no good as trolls will post new threads to get attention to what they think are their stunning and hilarious views.

So as I said above, go to /video game generals/ instead, and hopefully a janitor or mod will clean up there if someone tries to drag /vg/ into the mess,

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:21:53 No.462821
>>462813
They're just going to change it to Jew Overlord or something. We've tried banning words before, it never fucking works.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:21:55 No.462822

[Missing image file: finalday.png]
There's no stopping it. Just brace for impact.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjXutKsizE8

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:22:24 No.462823
I agree. Please do something.
Make posting "Anita" first yield a warning, and then a ban.
Please have janitors and mods be ready for this shit.

/v/ will be unusable for hours otherwise.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:22:27 No.462824
>>462814
shut the fuck up. no one knows who he is and no one cares. i have closed every single one of his youtube videos before the 2 second mark.

back on subject - mods should only delete anita threads that are obvious trolls, such as "anita's right" or "hey this video is actually good"

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:22:51 No.462825
>>462817
So even if the majority of feminists disagree with her views, she represents them anyway because 'a lot' of them do and loads of men gave her money because they felt guilty and wanted to feel better?

With that kind of logic, you can support any argument, you just look dumb doing so.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:22:58 No.462826
>>462818
>Well he surely represents all of neo-/v/, what with how much they suck his cock.

/v/ framed him for plotting a school shooting and he was arrested and held in Federal custody for 3 days, so....

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:23:52 No.462827
>>462826
Oh wow, I feel so bad for him now, I should surely start sucking his cock and ask him to represent me!

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:24:57 No.462828
You can't stop it. Just hide the thread and move on. If you jump into them, saging and announcing your reports, you'll only vindicate them.

Just get over it already.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:25:05 No.462829
>>462818
The fact that people get baited into threads by him or his copycats on an HOURLY basis is just fucking sad

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:25:25 No.462830
just hide the fucking threads. this is how to ignore any shitposting, here you go:

http://catalog.neet.tv/q/

use this, hide anita threads, stop whining like entitled 16 year olds that anita threads aren't vidya, vidya was never more than shallow trolling anyway. shut the fuck up.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:25:52 No.462831
>>462825
She represents a large portion of feminists. Whether she represents "all", "most", or "a large number" is irrelevant nitpicking.

She is a prominent spoksesperson and role model, she is respected and funded by a large number of feminists. That's all that matters.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:26:33 No.462833
>>462827

Clearly I mean that /v/ doesn't "suck his cock".

He was arrested some time ago (2 years?) I doubt he would think it a good idea to keep posting, not to mention the police would have ordered him not to, so "Quentin threads" are probably just trolls pretending to be him.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:27:48 No.462835
>>462831
Ok, you've nearly backpedaled far enough that I can agree with you.

What point was it you were trying to make?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:29:36 No.462836
MODS ARE FAGGOTS LEL

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:30:07 No.462837

[Missing image file: 532191_477379918949691_40(...).jpg]
>>462755
okay, but PLEASE no pic of her head, her face is disgusting

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:31:49 No.462838
>>462835
Your point was that she doesn't represent feminism as a whole. No shit. Nobody does. It's not a coherent ideology. You have radfems who hate trannies, sex-negative feminists who are bigger prudes than the fucking amish and deathly afraid of sex, etc.

She does represent a large portion of feminists, however, and as such any arguments against Anita can be said to be leveled against [her and her supporters' version of] feminism.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:34:03 No.462840
>>462838
So you're just running off at the mouth without actually saying anything, gotcha.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:34:16 No.462841
I'm supporting this.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:34:42 No.462842
Report her video for all kinds of shit, so people can't watch it on youtube

Shitstorm is slowed down by 90%

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:35:53 No.462843
>>462833
Apart from the fact that he makes videos with the intention to troll /v/, so it is him.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:36:52 No.462844
One way to avoid it is to just not go on /v/ tomorrow and play video games or something.

Also what >>462783 said, we really need IDs.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:38:21 No.462845
>>462751
Who is this and why do you all hate her?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:38:27 No.462846

[Missing image file: 1361521372069.png]
>>462751
>>462751
>>462751
I normally hate Anita threads, but I want to watch /v/ tear this cunt apart.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:39:30 No.462847
>>462802
That was 100 years ago.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:41:02 No.462849
gotta agree with this, at the very least force people to keep it to a sticky

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:42:38 No.462850
Sticky and ban everyone posting about her somewhere else

win-win

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:43:16 No.462851

[Missing image file: popcornstanza.gif]
>>462846
I hope /pol/ and /b/ join them.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:43:59 No.462852
>>462850
Or sticky it, then ban everyone that posts in it.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:44:54 No.462854
>>462846
>>462851

You do realise that will only give her shitloads of free media attention whiteknighting her?

The more /v/ attacks her, the more attention she'll get and the more money she'll make.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:46:53 No.462857

[Missing image file: dean_facepalm.jpg]
Anita is going to use the retarded fucks on /v/ and whereever else who comment on her video to make it seem like she is right.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:46:54 No.462858
/v/ here

Gonna have to agree. Make it a banable offence to discuss feminism on /v/


None of those threads have anything to do with video games.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:47:35 No.462859
>>462846
this!
it will be glorious

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:48:39 No.462860
>>462859
Why, so she can use all the negative attention the exact same way she did during her kickstarter?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:49:13 No.462861
>>462854
Even if /v/ decides to not do anyhting, she will receive attention anyway.
All MRM on ribbit and tumblr will notice this and attack her.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:50:56 No.462862

[Missing image file: anita shitposting.png]
>just hide and report

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:53:10 No.462863
>>462861
>tumblr
>hating Anita

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:53:49 No.462864

[Missing image file: 1356475861177.jpg]
>>462751
>we need a mod who constantly browses /v/ and deletes ever single one of these threads

>/v/
>Mods

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:53:58 No.462865
Anita Sarkeesian makes a video gets lots of money, makes another video.
All because she doesn't like female characters in video games because they are portrayed badly, she demands the entire industry be changed to suit her.

how fucked up is that?
I hated the avengers movie, and the Thor movie because of how bullshit and wimpy it made my glorious norse gods.
Loki being smashed around by the hulk when he could have just incinerated him in a second seems like bullshit. So can i go on youtube, demand a shit tonne of money to make shitty videos about my hatred of my glorious norse gods being turned into pussies?
Yes, i can but i accept that most people like a movie that ruined my god dammed religion.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:54:57 No.462866
>>462863
Scratch tumblr then, but rebbit will go apeshit

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:56:46 No.462869
OP a suggestion?

Filter "Anita" and "Tropes"

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:56:50 No.462870
>>462798
>"Just sweep up all the dirt in a pile, then hide it under the rug"

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 11:57:02 No.462871
>>462842
>Report her video for all kinds of shit, so people can't watch it on youtube

Great idea nerd, get her more sympathy and attention, and spark articles in the mainstream media

>RAID FOR GREAT JUSTICE MY /b/ROTHER!

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:01:40 No.462873
>>462751
why?

she's discussing vidya

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:02:20 No.462874
so are we going to mirror and take away from her views?
I heard it a couple of days ago and it sounds like the best action

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:02:48 No.462875
>>462869
>filtering

Filtering doesn't do anything, it doesn't' stop people from talking about it, and its really easy to get around

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:02:51 No.462876
She's discussing video games and we're helping the industry with chasing the feminist and jews away. Let it be you fucking niggers.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:03:39 No.462879
>>462875
It does plenty, it is easy as fuck, and I don't care if they are talking about it when I can't see it.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:04:42 No.462880
>>462873
this

it's video games related, it belongs on /v/

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:05:21 No.462882
"GUYS STOP TALKING ABOUT HER"
"SERIOUSLY GUYS STOP TALKING ABOUT ANITA SARKEESIAN"
"WHY ARE YOU STILL TALKING ABOUT HER!?"

Don't you realise it's too late? She's made 160,000 thousand dollars off fuck tards like you slamming her videos. Do you honestly think her keeping the comments and ratings open on her kickstarter video wasn't a ploy to rally more people who think she's being 'harassed' so they donate to her cause?

She will be finished when people ignore her, her haters far outweight her supporters.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:05:30 No.462883
>>462873
>>462880

>ID: VUcQNXJX

You realize we can see you samefaggging?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:06:33 No.462884
>>462751
>/v/ should only discuss the things i like

you faggots are just as bad as she is

vidya = vidya

no matter how you "feel" about what she has to say about vidya

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:07:35 No.462886
>>462883
felt like elaborating

see >>462884

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:07:54 No.462887

[Missing image file: samefaggot.png]
>>462873
>>462880
>>462884

First time on /q/?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:08:37 No.462889
>>462886

No you weren't, you just got caught redhanded faggot.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:08:56 No.462890
>>462886
That's why you replied to your own post with
>this

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:10:52 No.462892
>>462755
Agreed. Means she will only be talked about in one place. Those who want to wade through the shit can do so, and everyone else will keep clean boots and talk about vidya.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:12:40 No.462894
>>462887
>>462889

Now I really want IDs on /v/.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:13:19 No.462896
>>462892

>only be talked in one place

No, she won't. You're an idiot if you think that's the case. Just because we had a PS4 sticky didn't stop people making twenty other threads about it.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:15:52 No.462898

[Missing image file: 1335943952352.png]
the solution is simple guys, we just need to have so much constant on topic video game discussion that all this anita nonsense will be unable to be found on /v/.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:24:25 No.462905
>>462898
That'll only happen after HL2: Episode 3 is released.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:24:35 No.462906

[Missing image file: hey anon.gif]
>>462887
Yes, sempai treat me gently

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:29:47 No.462911
>>462896
So you also have mods taking down other threads. But it will at least detract some attention, otherwise people will either try constantly, or try other boards.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:31:56 No.462913
>>462911

The problem is getting the mods and janitors there. /v/ moves so fucking fast.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:36:04 No.462917
>>462913

/v/ is essentially /b/ (sfw) with also Publisher marketers posting viral threads as well. For some reason the mods don't touch the 4-5 Tomb Raider threads going at the same time since its against the rules.

Guess the mods must be getting some sweet kickbacks.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:38:14 No.462919
>>462917
>Publisher marketers posting viral threads as well.

Shit like this is why mods and janitors don't bother moderating /v/, why try keeping such a turd clean?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:38:42 No.462920
>>462917
>/v/
>sfw

HAHAHAHA, oh wait you're serious!

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:39:37 No.462921
>>462917

Well, to be fair, the game just came out.

And even you talking with a friend IRL about some game he hadn't heard about could be technically considered marketing/advertising.

I'm not saying there isn't any advertising on /v/, but it's not as bad as you think.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:40:14 No.462922
>>462920
that's the part of his post you take issue with?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:45:58 No.462931
>>462760
>It's not the moderator's responsibility to moderate the board

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:47:59 No.462933
>>462931

Mods are global, they're not board-specific.

Though I do occasionally wonder how many mods and janitors it would take to shape /v/ up to what it should be.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:48:27 No.462934
>>462931
If 90% of the users want to turn the board into a shithole, what right do the moderators have to say that they can't?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:50:32 No.462935
>>462933
It doesn't matter, it's still their duty to moderate the board. What else are they good for? Sticking retarded troll threads in /g/? Turning /b/ upside down?

>>462934
>If 90%

[citation needed]

>what right

Are you really asking this?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:50:39 No.462936
>>462934

That's quite a presumption you have there.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:50:45 No.462937
>>462931
Back when /vg/ was created the mods cracked down on shitposting in /v/. /v/ fought back and said they LIKED the shitposting

I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to moderate a board like that. At least /vp/ reacted POSITIVELY to mod support

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:52:01 No.462938
>>462937

>/v/ fought back and said they LIKED the shitposting

/v/ isn't one person. I was away during that period, so I have no first hand impression of the shitposting going on. Also, vocal minority.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:52:43 No.462939
>>462935
>>462936
/v/ hates being moderated, you can see the backlash when there's actually a mod about doing his job, and you can see the board revert when they give up after a couple of hours.

>>462937
Yeah, that was a lovely couple of weeks after the creation of /vg/, it's a real shame moot had to be such a massive faggot and say that '/v/ culture' was acceptable.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:52:55 No.462940
>>462937
>>462934
Is the board called /v/ - Shitposting or /v/ - Video Games?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:53:57 No.462943
>>462939
The only people that hate being moderated are the people who are shitposting themselves (inb4 hurr 1000000% of the board hurrhurr so witty)

No shit they're going to whine about it.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:56:19 No.462944
>>462940
7/10, had to go and double check.

>>462943
I'm saying that anyone with any sense gave up ages ago, /v/ isn't the home of /v/irgins anymore, it's the lair of /v/tards.

moot apparently agrees, given how much random /b/ shit he's forced on it for 'teh lulz'.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 12:59:25 No.462946
>>462921

The rule is, look for the thread on the game you are looking for and post on it.

I saw twenty threads in 3 hours saying "Wow this game is Amazing /v/" with up to 5 on the board at the same time.

So either they are idiotic morons making threads because they cant be bothered browsing, or they are marketers. Both are rule breakers.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:00:20 No.462947
>>462944
Mods are there to eradicate that kind of behaviour regardless of if it's a lost cause or not. Complaints will continue as long as they aren't doing their job

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:21:19 No.462954
>>462947
But /v/ is already the most moderated board. The real problem lies in your userbase. Be honest with yourselves here. I bet the average age of /v/ users is somewhere around 15-17 years old who have graduated from /b/ or possibly even started on /v/ to begin with. /v/ is a gateway board.

/v/ users really do need a crash course on the available features of 4chan so moderation would not need to be as heavily relied upon.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:22:34 No.462955
>>462954
I'm 21 and I started using /v/ last year. I never even used /b/ at all (besides porn or the occasional glance at the catalog).

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:23:55 No.462956
Has it started yet? there's nothing on the catalogue, and it wouldn't really be right for them to be banned on principle.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:24:05 No.462957
>>462954
/v/ can never take any responsibility, all you'll get is a list of escape goats.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:25:31 No.462958
>>462955
Well I guess that proves part of my point. I started on /v/ too, but got sick and tired of so many moderators being so inconsistent. That and the board splits only made it easier to post off-topic.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:26:41 No.462962

[Missing image file: 1362188784126.jpg]
>>462958
I actually went from /co/ and /pol/ and "graduated" to /v/. It's a shitty board, but some of the threads are ok like the Zelda generals.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:27:26 No.462963

[Missing image file: Not gokool.png]
>>462937
>/v/ said they LIKED the shitposting
Anita Sarkeesian threads are not shitposting. She is a huge part of gaming culture and it makes /v/ angry whenever moderators delete threads about her but do nothing about the viral marketing problem

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:28:03 No.462964
>>462954
>>462958
I'm 22 and I started browsing 4chan in 2007. Started with /b/, left it after one month when I realized there was no method to their madness. I've been going to /v/ and other boards ever since.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:29:01 No.462966
I propose a week long ban to anyone that starts an Anita Sarkeesian thread and and anyone who seriously replies to it. This feminism faggotry has long outstayed it's welcome to the point that I'm now seeing more and more /pol/shits on /v/ posting offtopic shit. I don't give a fuck whether you hate women or not. And I'll agree that Sarkeesian is a brainless bitch, but these threads are never about videogames and are just /v/'s new tfw no gf threads

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:29:57 No.462967
>>462964
I forgot to make a point, and my point is that giving up on the board is up to the individuals. I've been going there for five years and I don't see how the situation is unfixable. It just requires a lot of willpower from both the mods and the userbase.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:32:02 No.462969
>>462967
I agree that mods need to be more consistent. However, that problem boils down to there being too many interpretations of the rules. The are some stream threads left alone, while others deleted for reasons unknown for instance.

Self moderation tools like hide, filter, and report would make the average users experience much better. Unless they really are the type where if something displeases them they make a crusade to eradicate it.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:32:08 No.462970
>>462963
Anita threads are shitposting, but like I said earlier, this is a special occasion.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:32:30 No.462972
>>462954

Yes, I know that the majority of the board, or at least the most vocal posters are within that age range considering after 3pm US time the shitposting starts to increase.

Exactly what would you like to propose to remove basically one of the major demographics for AAA game titles?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:34:39 No.462976
>>462972
It really isn't about purging of the underage. It's more about this post:
>>462969

Proper self moderation on the whole makes things better for you personally, and tailors the board to your wants without a mod.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:35:06 No.462977
>>462969
Borderline vidya threads aren't the problem, the problem is straight non vidya content like >tfw no gf and the people who post in those threads unironically. Those are the people that should be banned (and the reason we need IDs since most of the replies are usually the OP samefagging baiting for attention)

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:36:50 No.462979
>>462969

I agree with this. Rules seem to subjectively change as to their interpretation depending on who is the janitor/mod on at the time. Then you have the userbase which is also split.

Tropes vs Women in Videogames Discussion - "Not related to Vidya - take it to /pol/"

Favourite Anime artstyle games - "Get the fuck out weeb, go back to /jp/ or /a/"

Videogame Forums, any good ones out there? - "Not videogame related, hiding and reporting"

These are just examples off the top of my head.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:40:41 No.462984
>>462977
>/v/ having IDs
Oh...you're one of those people. /v/ having idea is retarded as hell and goes against one of the most important principles of 4chan. Anonymity.

And obviously, blatant non-vidya threads are the worst, but that doesn't mean we should ignore these fucking feminism threads. Just because they have something vaguely to do with videogames doesn't mean they should be tolerated. Every time an anita thread appears, the thread fucking derails in to women general. They're shit threads populated by shitposters. The worst scum of /v/ who shouldn't be able to think their crap is welcome here.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:41:43 No.462986
>>462984
huur having *IDs*

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:42:39 No.462988
>>462966
No, brah, let's give them a YEARLONG ban. No, wait, a DECADE! Fuck it, let's give it all we've got, A CENTURY!

And nobody will give a fuck.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:44:03 No.462992
>>462988
It's a whole lot better than doing nothing and acting like those faggots can get away with it. Most of them genuinely think they aren't shitposting.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:44:45 No.462994
>>462984

I always wonder, why is it there is so much hate for Anita threads that contain shitposting.

And yet I never hear anything from you people about the other recurring shitposting/bait threads?

tfw no g/f
tfw <game character> will never be your waifu
Why don't you stop playing vidya and go outside Anon?
So you play videogames Anon? Like one of those Basement dwellers?
Praise our Based Gaben
18 and still being a /v/irgin
You have 10 seconds to be weeb as possible

Need I go on?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:45:49 No.462996
>>462984
I'm still anonymous, you just can see which posts in this thread were me.
If somebody makes a thread on /v/ with a blatantly inflammatory or controversial OP and then bumps it pretending to be other people, the thread gets mistaken for being active and people start posting in it spontaneously.
If we had IDs that would kill shitposting threads without any action needing to be taken on anyone's part.
It would only be bad for the first couple of weeks, then people would get used to them and things would settle down.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:46:23 No.462998
>>462994
Are we really supposed to provide you with a list of everything else wrong with /v/ if we have something to complain about?

*I also dislike your attitude and think your mum serves inferior breakfast.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:48:43 No.463000
>>462998

No I'm saying that you single out Anita threads which ARE related to vidya, but usually filled with shitposters.

And you decide to lump that thread in with threads that have usually NOTHING to do with Vidya, they were flamebait/shitposts from the beginning.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:48:47 No.463001
>>462994
>Why don't you stop playing vidya and go outside Anon?
>So you play videogames Anon? Like one of those Basement dwellers?
>18 and still being a /v/irgin
>You have 10 seconds to be weeb as possible

But I fucking despise those threads. The difference is that those threads are almost unanimously considered offtopic shitposting. Anita threads aren't and are still actively defended by a large number of /v/

As for the ones I left out, they at the very least stay ontopic and are videogame related. Sure, they're a bit pathetic and filled with shitty people, but they're far less frequent than the others.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:49:59 No.463003
>>462996
While ID's do present somewhat of a bandaid it does not stop off-topic posting. /b/ is a perfect example. The samefag arguments are also null and void considering the amount of IP switching and the ease of doing such. Having this piece of information, you are really then giving off-topic posters or even spammers more legitimacy seeing as they could fool the average poster.

If you really are worried about samefagging, m00t already gave us a wonderful tool that you haven't realized and now I am seeing it more used. Someone accuses you and you really didn't? Take a a screencap of the (you) part of their quote.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:54:10 No.463013
>>463003
>Having this piece of information, you are really then giving off-topic posters or even spammers more legitimacy seeing as they could fool the average poster.

This is assuming there are actually people in this world who would go to interminable trouble just to shitpost on an anonymous imageboard.
IDs work as both deterrence and countermeasure, and the shitposting would be reduced immensely regardless of the few sad individuals who would actually spend their day trolling /v/

>If you really are worried about samefagging, m00t already gave us a wonderful tool that you haven't realized and now I am seeing it more used. Someone accuses you and you really didn't? Take a a screencap of the (you) part of their quote.

I don't care about being accused of samefagging at all and I don't know where you got this idea. I'm saying some people use the lack of IDs to start flamewars and it's WAY too easy a thing to accomplish.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:56:14 No.463015
>>463013
So you're saying we should add artifical difficulty to samefagging?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:58:08 No.463016
>>462994
Because he's (she?) a feminist. It hurts their feelings when they see Anita being exposed for the jew she is.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 13:59:45 No.463020
>>463013
Just look at the amount of IP switching that goes on /q/. IP switching is really easier than you are making it out to be. /b/ did not see this immense decline of spam either after a week of ID implementation.

About the (you) comment it also helps if you asked the poster to prove he isn't samefagging by posting the cap. Samefagging solved without IDs.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:01:49 No.463024
>>463016
Oh fuck off, /v/ermin.
You know those threads are shitposting. I already said I think Saekeesian is a scummy bitch who's ripped off hundreds of people. But that doesn't stop these threads being cancerous. If you want to talk about the videogame industry, then fine. Post it on /v/. If you want to talk about women and feminism, take it to /pol/ or /r9k/.
It's not fucking hard.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:02:53 No.463026

[Missing image file: Cyberpunk 3.0.jpg]
>>462994

>implying

I report as many off-topic threads as I see. What else can I do but just report, hide and move on?

Recently I made a thread about some of the shitposting that goes on /v/, such as pic related.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:05:12 No.463031
The funniest thing is when you see bitching about women and feminism in one thread, and then people complaining that Lara Croft has been made weak and useless in the next.

If it wasn't for people like Anita communicating so horribly /v/ would be all over the underlying message in support of the idea of having well written characters in videogames, rather than lazy tropes. But no, one feminist manufactures and uses hate to get publicity and money, and suddenly women are the devil herself and the reason all of /v/ is virgins.

You've got to laugh, otherwise you'll go insane.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:07:33 No.463036
>>463024

> Anita Sarkeesian
> Creator of Tropes vs Women in Videogames
> K0taku Gamer of the Year for Social Change
> DICE Developer Conference Speaker

Not related to Videogame Industry?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:10:36 No.463042
>>463020
/b/ is by far the largest board on this site, it's the most known to the rest of the internet and so it's the one with the most new people coming and going. Moderating it is near impossible and nobody really even cares enough to try.
But /v/ isn't like that yet, there's plenty of people who actually care about content quality and are sad to see the constant shitposting. IDs would help in that regard as they would fuel community based moderation. I'm not saying it would eliminate the problem but it would help.

>About the (you) comment it also helps if you asked the poster to prove he isn't samefagging by posting the cap. Samefagging solved without IDs.

Provided that a) the person accused of samefagging is not trolling and is in it for actual discussion (which the shitposter are not) and is willing to provide said screenshot (which the shitposter are not and never will because it's against their interest) and b) they're being accused by someone who isn't shitposting or trolling. "Samefag" is often just a cop out reply to avoid giving counterpoints to certain posters, and sometimes even when you give proof that you are not in fact samefagging the person that was trolling you won't bother replying again.
It's not the same as IDs and it's not as effective.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:11:21 No.463045
>>463036

Not vidya. Sage.

Joke aside, it does not benefit the board in any manner.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:12:51 No.463047
>>463036
It's never related to videogames because the thread always derails into "women general." We've discussed all there is to discuss on the fucking subject and the threads are relentlessly spammed on the front page.
Honestly at the rate this is going, I'd also advocate shifting anita threads onto fucking /vg/

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:13:17 No.463048
>>463031

I am not against a Damsel in Distress, but I wouldn't mind a better written Damsel.

Anita presupposes that the Damsel shouldn't exist, which is just an asinine proposition, since you are now taking away a trope of storytelling, which now limits the design of the game.

My assumption, that if the roles were reversed and the male was the damsel, she would critique that either the female was being submissive during some scenes, or conversely, that she was not actually a woman, but a man with a female body.

It's quite easy to figure out which direction Anita will approach a topic.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:13:49 No.463049
>>463024
I said earlier in this thread that I agree Anita threads are normally shitposting, but today's a special day since it's THE HAPPENING of feminism in vidya gaems.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:14:50 No.463050
>>463031
>Hurr Anita's right!

Fuck. And you people say SRS doesn't exist.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:16:36 No.463053
>>463050
It doesn't. Believe it or not, some people have differing views to you. Many of the mare complete shit too.
Ans speaking of SRS, I've been seeing a lot of /pol/shit buzzwords like redpilling and shill being spammed on /v/ recently.
This worries me

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:17:17 No.463054
>>463026
What plugin do you use to get youtube links like that please?

>>463042
>/b/ is by far the largest board on this site

/v/ really isn't much smaller, all the same problems that apply to /b/ apply there too.

>>463036
The threads are never about the industry or her actions within or around it, just shitflinging and hyperbole.

>>463048
Yeah, by using tropes as her vehicle she achieves nothing more than neatly pigeon-holing female characters and then offering trite suggestions to improve matters, which wouldn't preclude her pigeon-holing in the first place.

She says and achieves very little, while building animosity from places like /v/ who see her as some horrible harpy come to take away their videogames, and then naturally they assume all feminists are like that.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:18:17 No.463056
>>463054

It's possibly my 4chan Media Player extension.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:19:48 No.463057
>>463050
Never said she was right or wrong, given that all she attempts to do is find female tropes, she's set the bar rather low for herself and it's not exactly hard to achieve her aims.

And SRS doesn't exist, at least not in the form people are telling you it is. PROTIP; When someone accuses someone else of spreading misinformation to mislead you, you should immediately suspect them of using misinformation to mislead you.

>>463056
I'll check it out, thanks.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:21:33 No.463060
>>463053
>This worries me
That people are waking up? I'll bet it does.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:22:56 No.463062
>>463057
>And SRS doesn't exist, at least not in the form people are telling you it is. PROTIP; When someone accuses someone else of spreading misinformation to mislead you, you should immediately suspect them of using misinformation to mislead you.
I've spoken to some of these people who have admitted to raiding /pol/. Trust me, the invasion exists. Just look at yourself, you're defending Anita and saying she makes good points. Fuck.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:28:35 No.463064
>>463060
No, it worries me that /pol/ has a more active presence on /v/ and is spreading their bullshit and shitposting in threads.
First it was /r9k/ with all that tfw no gf and feminism threads, and now it's /pol/ with its fear mongering propaganda.
it isn't videogames and doesn't belong on /v/

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:28:57 No.463065
>>463062
>you're defending Anita and saying she makes good points

Oh dear, I'm saying she sets the bar so low that it's difficult for her not to achieve her aims, and suddenly I'm praising her actions in defence of womon kind against the evil male scourge?

>I've spoken to some of these people who have admitted to raiding /pol/.

I've spoken to people who said they were the king of england, this does not mean they actually are.

Either way, you're clearly too far gone to see me as anything other than an agent for or against whatever agenda you've got mixed up in, so I'll not bother trying to reason with you. (For the record, I despise Anita for bringing politics into videogames and setting the feminist cause so many steps backwards in the eyes of gamers.)

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:32:14 No.463067
>>463065
>Oh dear, I'm saying she sets the bar so low that it's difficult for her not to achieve her aims

If by "achieve her aims" you mean criticizing storytelling tropes without any research or facts to back up why they are bad, how they influence public perception or gamer perception.

Just meekly commenting on tropes and rolling your eyes as if that's all you need to convince someone its wrong.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:32:23 No.463068
anita is well-intentioned and fair minded. she is not out to destroy the little boys' clubhouse and she is not a man-hater.

try to look at her position with an open mind.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:33:46 No.463070
>>463068
Now this is just black flag.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:34:03 No.463071
>>463065
>I've spoken to people who said they were the king of england, this does not mean they actually are.
They were confirmed SRSers. How is a confession not proof? Do you think these people go around telling everyone in the internet they troll on /pol/ like that's an honorable/unbelievable thing?

>Either way, you're clearly too far gone to see me as anything other than an agent for or against whatever agenda you've got mixed up in, so I'll not bother trying to reason with you. (For the record, I despise Anita for bringing politics into videogames and setting the feminist cause so many steps backwards in the eyes of gamers.)
>and setting the feminist cause so many steps backwards in the eyes of gamers
You hate her because she makes feminists look bad, not because she's ruining vidya.

Thanks for proving my point.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:35:06 No.463072
>>463064
>Only liberals belong on /v/!

Uh huh.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:35:35 No.463073
>>463068

Whom are you exactly trying to trick here?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:37:32 No.463075
It'll be fun to let the shitstorm flow, just go to /vg/ for a while, it's clear that most of /v/ is going to witness this. Trying to "stop" her by ignoring it is stupid at this point.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:38:29 No.463077
>>463072
>Politics does not belong on /v/
Fuck off. I'd tell you faggots to fuck off if you were spouting left wing views too.

/v/ is not a politics board

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:39:14 No.463078
>>463072
/q/ is full of control-freaks and authortarian types who want to dictate exactly what isn't and is allowed (the primary, secondary, tertiary rule is too vague for these faggots). It's no surprise it's made up of leftists.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:39:58 No.463080
>>463078
Read
>>463077
you braindead faggot

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:41:02 No.463083
>>463080
Faggot is a homophobic word. Reported

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:42:26 No.463085
>>463083
It's against the rules to announce reports, you faggot ass nigger

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:43:08 No.463087
>>463067
That is exactly what I'm saying, well done!

You get a gold star.

>>463071
>How is a confession not proof?

I'm a SRS poster.

I just confessed, does that mean I am one now? I'd really love to be one of the admins, should I add that to my confession so I can get promoted?

>she's ruining vidya

She's done fuck all, a few videos pointing out tropes has not changed a damn thing.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:44:57 No.463090
>>463080
How come mods didn't stop violent video games being banned threads? After all, that was politics.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:47:45 No.463094
>>463090
>violent vidoegames getting banned
I'd probably consider that shitposting, considering it sounds like bait. But it depends what the content of the thread is. If the thread actually is discussing videogame violence and isn't derailing into a purely political/philosophical discussion or just shitposting, then I have no problem with it.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:51:22 No.463097
>>463094
What do you do if the discussion is about videogame violence and "political discussion"?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:51:26 No.463098

[Missing image file: ME3_Steven_Cortez.png]
>>463087
>She's done fuck all, a few videos pointing out tropes has not changed a damn thing.
Mainstream companies like Ubisoft and Bioware have been changing their games to attract the tumblr audience. Anita is partly responsible for this. Just like at how Shitaku fellates her.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:51:52 No.463099
Okay, what the fuck is SRS? I seriously have no idea what you guys are even talking about.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:54:05 No.463102
>>463097
Tell the political fags to shut the hell up and not derail the thread?
If it turns out that that's impossible and the thread will always derail into /pol/shit then the threads shouldn't be tolerated.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:54:38 No.463105
>>463099
>SRS
Why, that'd be the Socialist Republic of Serbia, of course.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:57:06 No.463109
>>463102
What do you classify as /pol/shit?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:57:27 No.463111
>>463054
>>463054
>What plugin do you use to get youtube links like that please?

Youtube Link Title script for greasemonkey

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:58:11 No.463113
>>463109
Anything he doesn't like

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:58:33 No.463115
>>463071
> For the record, I despise Anita for bringing politics into videogames and setting the feminist cause so many steps backwards in the eyes of gamers

I'd like to know who these "true feminists" are and what they represent, because it seems to me that those seem to be invisible next to the "visible" feminists similar to Anita.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 14:59:17 No.463117
>>463099
A social marxist forum

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:01:48 No.463123
>>463113
Pretty much /q/ in a nutshell

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:14:43 No.463136
>>463105

Good one. Especially since I'm actually from Serbia. We haven't been socialist in a while now.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:19:56 No.463142
>>463098
Have they fuck, Bioshock Infinite showed a different costume for their heroine and from /v/'s response you'd think the patriarchy had been smashed and a new all female age had begun.

Her influence is vastly overstated by her detractors.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:23:25 No.463148
>>463111
Great, thanks!

>>463115
That's going to be tricky, given that anyone identifying as feminist will call themselves true feminists and decry others.

But yeah, same as with any other kind of politics, the loud attentionwhores will shout out the more rational members. You've just got to dig a bit if you really want to find out.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:31:25 No.463153
>>463148
Protip: If you say the word whore, you are not a true feminist, because that "demeans women".

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:35:12 No.463156
>>463153
Oh, whoops, forgot I was supposed to be pretending to be a feminist to bait you retards.

Whatever can I do now, I'll never get to be a SRS admin now!

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:41:31 No.463161
>>463148

Well the perceived stereotypical hardline-sex-negative-anti-partriarchy-feminist appears to me at least. To be the most vocal and most organized group. After I dig deeper I run into the sex-positive feminists and the anti-feminism-feminists, and various others, which appear to be loosely affiliated and uninterested in organizing to combat their hardline brethren.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:42:07 No.463162

[Missing image file: 1.jpg]
>>463153

well it's also a pointless insult that adds nothing of value to the conversation and marks you as bad at rhetoric....

...Which I'm sure everyone on /v/ desperately cares about *sigh* oh I'm sorry, I forgot that everyone 4chan has to be a fucking gelatinous label monster nowadays, marching in lockstep to the asyncopated drum spaz leading this big gay band of fuckholes. Roll up roll up and pick a label! You're either with us or again' us etc...

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:42:11 No.463163
>>463153
Not if you're a sex-positive feminists. They're perfectly fine with whores.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:45:58 No.463166
>>463161
Yes, it's all very confusing, which is why I just don't bother.

I think I'm broadly a humanist, but I'm too lazy and cynical to take useful action, hence 4chan.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:52:58 No.463174
>>463166

Well I don't really believe that Feminism or Humanism can really exist practically.

Sure, some are trying to fight for better rights for women in third world countries, but I've never seen them set up a protest calling for them to be added to the draft, or their physical requirements for being a soldier or Firefighter to be increased to match males.

If you look at how genders and society works, its a nice thought to think everything could be equal, but it's completely impractical.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 15:55:00 No.463179

[Missing image file: placenta.jpg]
>>463163

They're perfectly fine with prostitution as long as it's organic field raised prostitutes who run their own brothels and only fuck clients while a large burly predator drone watches to make sure the client doesn't "decapitate" the protistutes (or whatever fancy PC and health&safety term those hysterical feminazis are using these days for some good sharp neck loving).

Typical libtard pantytwisting, sure they're "okay" with something, but there's always gotta be caveats, not like back in 2006 before endless september kicked in, when you could dismember a jewess and keep her pickled internal organs in your cupboard without being forced to seek "counselling" by a "court". @_@

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 16:00:08 No.463185
I don't get it, why the fuck should it be banned? It is absolutely video game related.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 16:01:11 No.463188
>>463174
True, but I consider it much the same as fighting fires, you're never going to stop fires from happening but that doesn't mean you shouldn't take every effort to both prevent them and combat them when they occur.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 16:06:19 No.463201
>>463188

Is there ever a danger of over-representation? too much positive-discrimination?

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 16:09:58 No.463205
>>463201
I don't consider myself even nearly well informed enough to say, but to say it's impossible would be foolish.

Smothering your children in fire retardant foam would be taking fire safety too far, there are extremes for everything.

>>
Anonymous 2013-03-07 16:49:26 No.463285
>>463205

How disgustingly reasonable.







[  3  /  a  /  adv  /  an  /  c  /  cgl  /  ck  /  cm  /  co  /  diy  /  fa  /  fit  /  g  /  i  /  ic  /  jp  /  k  /  lit  /  m  /  mlp  /  mu  /  n  /  o  /  p  /  po  /  q  /  sci  /  sp  /  tg  /  toy  /  trv  /  tv  /  v  /  vg  /  vp  /  w  /  wg  /  wsg  /  x  ]

Contact me | All the content on this website come from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

Dofus quêtes

Page loaded in 0.024687 seconds.