Warning: All the content of this page originally come from 4chan.org. This is only a partial archive made to avoid destruction. Some posts and images may be missing. All the messages below have been posted by anonymous users and we do not guarantee any truth of what they said. For any illegal content, please contact me so that I can immediatly destroy it! Anonymous 2013-01-27 21:55:50 No.5476990
[Missing image file: Richard_Feynman_Nobel.jpg]
"In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of some phony God's blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence."
sage 2013-01-27 21:57:32 No.5476994
if only it were a downvote
Anonymous 2013-01-27 21:57:49 No.5476997
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:02:21 No.5477014
Didn't he have the IQ of a mentally retarded person?
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:04:24 No.5477022
I don't even know why you guys spam this shit here, I mean some fo the religion trolls are even funny but this shit is not even that.
Just go back to reddit.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:06:23 No.5477032
No. His IQ was 125.
Who actually gives a damn about a scientist's personal life and beliefs or personality?
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:15:45 No.5477070
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:19:32 No.5477084
In the academic context 125 is a retard score. The average in science and math is above 140.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:22:23 No.5477099
>The average in science and math is above 140.
So there are a good number above and below 140?
Oh, and 
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:22:49 No.5477100
Indeed they are.
Scientists are no celebrities. They are symbols at best. Even Newton had dumb beliefs. Think Harold Camping was an idiot because he attempted to predict the end of the world based on the bible? Newton did the very same.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:23:09 No.5477103
[Missing image file: 1347915819918.jpg]
>125 is a retard score
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:24:42 No.5477108
Pythagoras founded a cult
Newton was nuts
Dirac was autistic
Godel went loopy near the end
Nash was schizo
Einstien followed spinoza
Penrose views the universe as platoninc
None of which affected the significance or validity of any of thier work
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:35:43 No.5477151
[Missing image file: sasha grey port..jpg]
"In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of some phony sympathy for a friend. But because, I am filled by three big cocks."
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:37:30 No.5477156
Who is she? Are there any nudes of her? Or at least some fake nudes?
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:38:10 No.5477160
Newfags. Newfags never change. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sasha_Grey
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:39:56 No.5477162
>Oldfag here. Damn i cant stand this newfags!
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:40:24 No.5477163
The patron sent of engineering
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:40:57 No.5477166
He was obviously joking
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:41:53 No.5477171
>calling others newfags
>falling for an obvious troll
>being a newfag
pick all 3
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:43:31 No.5477173
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:44:53 No.5477176
he never said this
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:45:10 No.5477178
My IQ is 84. Or so says the quiz I took.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:45:15 No.5477179
>falling for a trollfalling
Anonymous 2013-01-27 22:50:46 No.5477199
Is this the guy, from which Andrew Ryan was written off? Or some other guy from BS?
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:02:29 No.5477227
who is Feyneman?
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:05:17 No.5477231
Just look at this newfag.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:05:34 No.5477232
"Don't brush your teeth, kids! It's bad for you!"
"You're a faggot for washing your hands after you urinate."
-Richard Feynman to Murray Gell-Mann
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:07:29 No.5477239
This doesn`t seem right.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:11:12 No.5477245
It's off reddit. This was a heavily downvoted post (710 to 110 upvotes), and a screenshot was posted to 4chan.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:13:22 No.5477251
Yeah, it's a quotation created by a smug, 15 year old atheist on reddit. The original post was severely downvoted, but it was reposted superimposed on a picture of Neil DeGrasse Tyson and it was lapped up.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:17:48 No.5477261
I paraphrase, but there's a video on Youtube about Murray Gell-Mann talking about how much of a pretentious cunt Feynman was. Way different from how he presented himself.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:19:24 No.5477266
Who cares, he was a good man.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:20:53 No.5477271
Um, not particularly. He was a pretentious hipster who was also an ostentatious douchebag.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:21:53 No.5477273
I heard Murray Gell-Mann was kind of an asshole.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:22:45 No.5477274
Do not forget Tesla. Voices and hallucinations and other such fun things.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:25:39 No.5477282
>Pythagoras founded a cult
>Einstien followed spinoza
>Penrose views the universe as platoninc
What's wrong with any of these things?
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:42:58 No.5477329
He invented stuff, you know? And being any king of person means nothing. You contributions to the progress of specie is only thing that matters.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:43:48 No.5477332
Nope, the satisfaction of my own desires is the only thing that matters.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:47:16 No.5477342
Your desires will be gone alongside with you. Contributions will live. It is the thing, that makes you special. And in the end what else would you want from life?
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:47:38 No.5477344
If anything, Gell-Mann was pretentious. Feynman may have been any number of bad things (probably arrogant and full of himself), but hardly pretentious.
Gell-Mann on the other hand, was the man who named the quark after James Joyce's Finnegans Wake. Obviously, Joyce deserves having elementary particles named in his honour as much as Spielberg would deserve the honour of discovering the DNA. (Gell-Mann also introduced the term "eightfold way" to physics.) So if anything, Gell-Mann was the pretentious one.
Both were brilliant scientists, though, without a doubt. (Looking at QED and QCD, this becomes apparent.)
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:51:46 No.5477361
"The printing press may have been one of the most destructive inventions of human history. It displaced primitive scientific reasoning with ready appeals to authority. Commoners began seeking meaning and truth in the printed word rather than in reality. Modern scholars of literature are the epitome of this cancer."
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:57:51 No.5477379
Who cares if they live?
Your desire is some legacy in the "progress" of mankind, and all you want is to satisfy this desire, but you attempt to make it somehow more than it is.
Anonymous 2013-01-27 23:58:46 No.5477383
Feynman was fucking around while his wife lay in bed dying of TB.
He was a cunt.
Anonymous 2013-01-28 00:05:34 No.5477413
[Missing image file: science fan.jpg]
Anonymous 2013-01-28 00:10:09 No.5477430
Oh come on no one uses 3.1 it's always 3.14
Anonymous 2013-01-28 00:11:17 No.5477434
3.1 is two digits
and that joke was stolen from toothpaste for dinner
Anonymous 2013-01-28 00:35:47 No.5477531
nothing, thats the point.
peronal live is not the work of the person
Anonymous 2013-01-28 04:01:34 No.5477967
No, it's not. An IQ of >140 is an idealization of what actually goes on in academia. Consider Richard Feynman to be a QED proof of your prediction being wrong.
Anonymous 2013-01-28 04:09:09 No.5477987
Other than the pretty much debunked strict determinism, what is wrong with Spinoza?
Anonymous 2013-01-28 04:13:56 No.5478001
Yes, everyone in science and math has the IQ of Nobel Laureates (~140 average in science)...A little cocky there?
Anonymous 2013-01-28 04:14:33 No.5478004
How does it feel knowing you will never achieve the understanding in your respective field as an 'academically retarded' person had in his own.
Feynman will always be your superior in terms of achievements.
Contact me | All the content on this website come from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.